<div style="text-align: justify; "><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;">The Appellate Division of the Supreme Court (SC) today allowed two leave to appeal petitions filed by BNP Chairperson Begum Khaleda Zia, staying the High Court order that extended her five-year jail term to 10 in Zia Orphanage Trust graft case.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">A three-member apex court bench, headed by Justice Md Ashfaqul Islam, passed the order this morning, stating that Khaleda Zia's sentence would remain stayed until the appeal in the case is decided.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">The apex court also asked the defence to submit concise statements on their appeal containing the points on which they will place arguments within two weeks.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">"The Appellate Division has stayed the execution of the sentence in the Zia Orphanage Trust graft case. It will hold a hearing on Khaleda Zia's appeal after completing the necessary process," Khaleda Zia's counsel Barrister Kayser Kamal said.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;">Senior advocates Zainul Abedin and AM Mahbub Uddin Khokon, Barrister Kayser Kamal, Barrister Md Ruhul Quddus Kazal, Advocate Gazi Qamrul Islam Sazal and Jakir Hossain Bhuiyan stood for Khaleda Zia, while Attorney General Md Asaduzzaman and Advocate Asif Hasan argued for the state and the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) respectively.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">"We have argued that the prosecution could not able to show any documents that Begum Khaleda Zia approved any note, or signed any cheques; they could not show any signature of Begum Khaleda Zia on any government documents. Even the fund, we are talking about, is in the bank intact," Barrister AM Mahbub Uddin Khokon told newsmen yesterday.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">"So how could they convict Begum Khaleda Zia for money embezzlement?" he said.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">"This infamous case was filed with a political scheme. The lower court concerned in February 2018, gave the judgment illegally. The High Court after that being politically biased, gave a judgment illegally, enhanced Begum Khaleda Zia's five-year jail term to 10 years after holding a one-sided hearing," Barrister Kayser Kamal said earlier.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">"Even the ACC counsel after reading out the FIR said a single penny wasn't embezzled from fund of Taka 2.33 crore. The whole fund is in the bank," he added.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Meanwhile, Begum Khaleda Zia's lawyer Barrister Md Ruhul Quddus Kazal said during the hearing, the defence argued that the lower court and the High Court sentenced her based on proofs those do not have any evidential values, adding: "That's why we pleaded for quashing of the judgments of the lower court and the High Court as well."</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">Dhaka Special Judge Court-5 on February 8, 2018, convicted former prime minister and BNP chairperson Khaleda Zia and sentenced her to five years' imprisonment in the case.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify;">It also sentenced five others including her son and BNP acting chairman Tarique Rahman to 10 years' imprisonment each.</div><div style="text-align: justify;">&nbsp;</div><div style="text-align: justify;">The High Court on October 30, 2018, extended the BNP chief's jail term to 10 years.</div><div style="text-align: justify;"><br></div><div style="text-align: justify; ">bnbd24/kh</div>